SpecEagle review · Motorola

Moto G (2013) review: The phone that redefined what a budget Android could be.

SpecEagle Editorial·Nov 2013·$179
Overall
46/100
Class rank
#18 of 29
Tier
Budget
Buy?
Look elsewhere
The verdict, up front

The budget phone that changed the rules.

The first Moto G proved a cheap Android phone didn't have to be terrible — near-stock software, timely updates and a clean HD screen at $179. It was a watershed that forced the entire industry to take the budget tier seriously.

01Display

60/100

60/100 — right at the average for budget phones of 2013.

TypeIPS LCD, 60 Hz
Size4.5 inches
Resolution1,280 × 720 px (HD)

02Camera

46/100

46/100 is one of the weaker camera results among budget phones of 2013 — 8 points under the average. Check the rows below before buying for this.

Main5 MP, f/2.4
Selfie1.3 MP

03Performance

50/100

50/100 — right at the average for budget phones of 2013.

ChipsetSnapdragon 400 (28 nm)
RAM1 GB
Storage8 / 16 GB

04Battery

56/100

56/100 is one of the weaker battery results among budget phones of 2013 — 9 points under the average. Check the rows below before buying for this.

Capacity2,070 mAh
Wired5 W

05Build

56/100

56/100 puts it above the 52-point average for budget phones of 2013.

06Value

80/100

At 80/100 this is one of the strongest value showings among budget phones of 2013 — 19 points above the cohort average.

What works
  • Near-stock Android with timely updates.
  • HD screen at a sub-$200 price.
  • Swappable back covers.
  • Got to Android 5.1 — rare for budget.
What doesn't
  • Only 8 GB, no microSD on base.
  • 5 MP camera was weak.
  • Mono speaker.
  • 3G only at launch.
Cross-shop it against
Redmi 1S
$120 · score 66/100

How this review is built: every section score, spec row and comparison on this page comes from SpecEagle's tracked catalogue — scores weight measured specs against the 29-phone cohort of budget devices released around the same time. We don't publish invented lab anecdotes. Spot an error? .