SpecEagle review · Xiaomi

Redmi K60 review: A 2K screen, wireless charging and a 5,500 mAh cell at a China-value price.

SpecEagle Editorial·Dec 2022·$370
Overall
80/100
Class rank
#1 of 8
Tier
Upper mid-range
Buy?
At the right price
The verdict, up front

The value flagship that added wireless charging.

K60 stood out by offering what Redmi usually skipped — a 2K flat panel and wireless charging — alongside the cool-running TSMC 8+ Gen 1, at a China-value price. The camera is the give-back. For performance and screen quality per yuan it was a standout of its season.

01Display

86/100

At 86/100 this is one of the strongest display showings among upper mid-range phones of 2022 — 7 points above the cohort average.

TypeAMOLED, flat, 120 Hz, 1,400 nits
Size6.67 inches
Resolution3,200 × 1,440 px (WQHD+)
ProtectionGorilla Glass Victus

02Camera

74/100

74/100 puts it above the 71-point average for upper mid-range phones of 2022.

Main64 MP, f/1.8 (OmniVision OV64B), OIS
Ultrawide8 MP
Macro2 MP
Selfie16 MP

03Performance

86/100

At 86/100 this is one of the strongest performance showings among upper mid-range phones of 2022 — 11 points above the cohort average.

ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm TSMC)
RAM8 / 12 / 16 GB
Storage128 / 256 / 512 GB

04Battery

84/100

84/100 puts it above the 78-point average for upper mid-range phones of 2022.

Capacity5,500 mAh
Wired67 W
Wireless30 W

05Build

78/100

78/100 — right at the average for upper mid-range phones of 2022.

06Value

84/100

At 84/100 this is one of the strongest value showings among upper mid-range phones of 2022 — 7 points above the cohort average.

What works
  • WQHD+ flat panel at $370.
  • TSMC-built 8+ Gen 1 runs cool and fast.
  • Wireless charging + 5,500 mAh — rare combo at the price.
  • Up to 16 GB RAM, IR blaster.
What doesn't
  • 64 MP camera trails newer 50 MP Sony sensors.
  • IP54 splash only.
  • China-only.
  • Two filler lenses.
Cross-shop it against
iQOO Neo 7
$370 · score 80/100

How this review is built: every section score, spec row and comparison on this page comes from SpecEagle's tracked catalogue — scores weight measured specs against the 8-phone cohort of upper mid-range devices released around the same time. We don't publish invented lab anecdotes. Spot an error? .