SpecEagle
SpecEagle review · Xiaomi

Redmi Turbo 4 Pro review: A 7,550 mAh gaming-value phone — the biggest battery in its class.

SpecEagle Editorial·Apr 2025·$280 (CN ¥1,999)
Overall
80/100
Class rank
#7 of 117
Tier
Mid-range
Buy?
At the right price
The verdict, up front

The biggest budget battery.

Redmi Turbo 4 Pro ships a 7,550 mAh silicon-carbon battery — the largest in the sub-$300 tier — alongside Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and IP69. Against the iQOO Neo 10 (similar chip, smaller battery) and POCO X7 Pro (its global twin), it wins on raw endurance.

01Display

84/100

84/100 puts it above the 81-point average for mid-range phones of 2025.

TypeAMOLED, 120 Hz, flat, 1.5K
Size6.83 inches
Resolution2,772 × 1,280 px
Peak brightness3,200 nits peak

02Camera

70/100

70/100 — right at the average for mid-range phones of 2025.

Main50 MP Light Hunter 800, f/1.9, OIS
Ultrawide8 MP
Selfie20 MP

03Performance

88/100

At 88/100 this is one of the strongest performance showings among mid-range phones of 2025 — 18 points above the cohort average.

ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm)
RAM12 / 16 GB LPDDR5X
Storage256 / 512 GB UFS 4.1

04Battery

98/100

At 98/100 this is one of the strongest battery showings among mid-range phones of 2025 — 14 points above the cohort average.

Capacity7,550 mAh silicon-carbon
Wired90 W

05Build

80/100

80/100 puts it above the 76-point average for mid-range phones of 2025.

06Value

92/100

At 92/100 this is one of the strongest value showings among mid-range phones of 2025 — 14 points above the cohort average.

What works
  • 7,550 mAh — biggest battery in the sub-$300 tier.
  • Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 + IP69.
  • 90 W charging at $280.
  • 1.5K 120 Hz AMOLED.
What doesn't
  • Weak 8 MP ultrawide.
  • 212 g heavy.
  • China-only retail (POCO X7 Pro is the global rebadge).
  • Wi-Fi 6 only.
Cross-shop it against
iPhone SE (2025)
$599 · score 84/100

How this review is built: every section score, spec row and comparison on this page comes from SpecEagle's tracked catalogue — scores weight measured specs against the 117-phone cohort of mid-range devices released around the same time. We don't publish invented lab anecdotes. Spot an error? .